Many in-house development teams lack the resources to thoroughly test the functionality they create before it is deployed. Even when there is a QA member on the team, this can occur because the QA is frequently stretched across multiple projects at the same time. This is a clear example of when independent testing might help.
But one issue that all organizations with in-house QA have faced is the uphill battle to keep a skilled QA team accessible on demand. Remember that in the software industry, both expertise and demand are subject to rapid change. Independent software testing services provide the benefit of a dedicated testing staff without the challenges of keeping one. Let’s take a closer look at some of the primary benefits:
1. Independent QA can assist in-house testers with time-consuming activities
Occasionally, extremely high-priority jobs or crucial new projects come out of nowhere and begin to consume the majority of the in-house testers’ time. When this happens, staying on top of the other, less urgent, time-consuming testing activities might be difficult.
Assigning the numerous time-consuming testing jobs to independent QA can greatly reduce the stress on in-house teams, allowing them to completely focus on the most important job responsibilities. At the same time, no quality of product will be affected in any sector or project.
2. Independent QA can assist in-house teams in meeting strict schedules.
In software development and testing, meeting strict schedules is a common occurrence. New product releases, enhancements, updates, and bug fixes are frequently required as quickly as possible. Such conditions can result in a high workload, the possibility of overtime work, and a struggle to fulfill deadlines for in-house QA teams. As a result, employees may experience stress, tiredness, and an overall damaging effect on their well-being. And it’s still possible that none of the tasks will be finished on time.
Independent QA can assist by carrying on some of the testing obligations and supplementing the in-house team with the necessary number of QA engineers. As a result, the deadlines will be completed without putting the in-house team under stress. The workload and schedule will remain consistent and manageable.
3. Independent testing allows non-QA professionals executing QA to concentrate on their core strengths
QA responsibilities are frequently delegated to specialists who do not specialize in software testing. Developers are frequently assigned to this task. Other personnel may be involved in QA in different conditions. Testing on top of their regular tasks means they have less time to concentrate on what they do best.
Independent QA can undertake all or portion of the testing obligations, allowing in-house QA personnel to focus on their primary responsibilities. The abilities and knowledge of the personnel will be best utilized in this manner. Their employee performance should increase as well because they’ll be able to do what they specialize in and prefer to do as a job.
4. Independent QA can rapidly add new expertise to in-house teams
The functionality of a software system can sometimes be greatly expanded, or a company can begin producing entirely new types of solutions. When this happens, the in-house QA team may need to quickly acquire new skills and knowledge. Whereas professional development is beneficial in and of itself, the need to attain it fast can put a lot of strain on in-house testers.
Independent QA can be useful in certain circumstances. Independent testers with the necessary competence can immediately take responsibility for testing the new functionality or specific product. Meanwhile, individuals of the in-house team can continue to gain new skills at their own speed.
5. Independent QA can provide in-house teams with a new perspective on the product
The thorough understanding and experience of the in-house QA team with the product undergoing test can be both an asset and a liability in QA. On the one hand, this is a good thing because the internal team understands how the solution is supposed to work and how it is implemented. However, this factor may prohibit in-house QA from anticipating unanticipated user behavior or end-user reactions to particular features of the product. Several bugs may go missed simply because individuals lose focus, perceptiveness, and interest when they gaze at something for too long or test something repeatedly.
As a result, in-house teams can benefit from independent QA to ensure the quality of the product and consistency in the most effective manner. Independent testers can provide a fresh perspective on the product and identify issues that the internal team may have overlooked. Independent QA engineers, in some ways, have the perspective of first-time end-users, but with the benefit of vast QA expertise and experience. In-house QA, with their in-depth knowledge of the solution, and independent testers, with their new perspective on it, can work together to get the greatest quality assurance outcomes.
Conclusion
Though it may appear that independent QA and in-house testers are fundamentally rivals, this is not the case. In fact, there are numerous ways that independent testers can assist in-house QA teams and make their job easier and more convenient. Independent QA can provide numerous benefits to in-house testers, ranging from reducing workload and releasing up a time to providing a fresh perspective on software. In many cases, the finest success will follow from these two parties working together.
So, if you’re a member of the in-house QA team, don’t be afraid to enlist the help of independent testing when you need it. If you’re an independent QA engineer, you should aim to assist the in-house testers as much as possible. If you have any questions, the TestDel software testing services team is always available.